Harmonic drive (strain wave) mounts represent a massive leap forward for portable astrophotography. Instead of relying on heavy traditional gears and bulky counterweights, they utilize compact, high-torque robotic gears that pack incredible lifting power into featherweight bodies under 5 kg (11 lbs). With these next-gen telescope mounts, you enter a world where balancing your telescope is no longer required under standard loads. Because the mount heads themselves are so light and strong, they are absolute game-changers for travel. Most models can easily carry a telescope entirely counterweight-free, and many can even switch into a simple Altitude-Azimuth (Alt-Az) mode if you want to swap out the camera setup for visual observations. Because this technology has taken the community by storm, this guide will walk you through the absolute best strain wave gear mounts available today across three functional categories—Ultra-Lightweight Travel, Intermediate Mobility, and Heavy-Titan Observatory setups—evaluating the top offerings from popular market favorites like ZWO alongside powerful alternatives from fellow industry giants like Sky-Watcher, iOptron, and Pegasus Astro.
By Wido Oerlemans | June, 2026
What is a Dual-Axis Strain Wave Mount?
To understand the engineering behind Dual-Axis Strain Wave Gear (Harmonic Drive) mounts, it helps to examine how completely they depart from traditional German Equatorial Mounts (GEMs). By integrating high-torque harmonic gears into both the Right Ascension (RA) and Declination (DEC) axes, these mounts offer an unprecedented payload-to-weight efficiency for astrophotographers. This unique mechanical leverage allows a featherweight 5 kg (11 lbs) mount head to safely carry over 15 kg (33 lbs) of advanced telescope gear.
Because the high-torque internal gears natively handle immense off-center loads, this design completely eliminates the need for heavy steel counterweights that are normally mandatory to balance a telescope payload. Furthermore, users can completely skip the time-consuming process of performing physical telescope balancing routines before every imaging session. The internal mechanics also completely eliminate traditional gear meshing, freeing owners from the tedious chore of long-term gear adjustments and maintenance. Additionally, the unique teeth mesh tightly enough to boast zero mechanical backlash, which means the mount changes tracking directions instantly without any lag. Finally, these systems offer dual Alt-Azimuth and Equatorial versatility, allowing you to easily switch between casual visual stargazing and tracking deep-sky astrophotography objects.
The Pros and Cons of Strain Wave (Harmonic) Drives
While the benefits of zero backlash, no balancing, and extreme weight reduction mentioned above make strain wave mounts look like magic, the design also introduces some engineering compromises:
- The Steep Periodic Error Curve: Because a strain wave gear relies on a flexible metal cup deflecting inside an outer ring, the system inherently produces a steep periodic error (PE) curve with rapid, short-term frequency spikes. Fortunately, real-world field testing has proven that deploying a standard 0.5 to 1-second autoguiding loop in software easily handles these spikes, consistently keeping final tracking error well below one arcsecond.
- No Optical Polar Scope: The compact, central placement of the RA motor housing completely obstructs the internal hollow channel required for an old-school optical polar scope, forcing an absolute reliance on computerized alignment software.
- Top-Heavy Center of Gravity: Because these mounts are incredibly lightweight but carry massive telescope loads, they create a highly top-heavy center of gravity. This requires a much stiffer, highly stable tripod class, and imagers often have to add a heavy weight or stone bag to the tripod base—not for telescope balancing, but simply to keep the entire rig firmly grounded against tip-over risks in high winds.
- The Back-Drive Risk: Due to the complete lack of physical balancing resistance, these mounts must incorporate internal electronic or mechanical safety brakes to prevent a catastrophic telescope “back-drive” collision with the tripod legs if the power cord is accidentally unplugged in the middle of the night.
ou might already be familiar with these details, but if you’re just starting out and feeling a bit overwhelmed, don’t panic! Check out my dedicated beginner’s guide where I break down the top 10 questions I frequently get about choosing a telescope mount for visual use, planetary imaging, and deep-sky astrophotography.
The Core Requirements for Serious Astrophotography
Before diving into specific models, let me first address the baseline requirements needed to engage in modern deep-sky astrophotography. To make the cut as a serious, future-proof imaging platform, a telescope mount must fulfill a strict baseline of mandatory “must-haves”:
- Native Equatorial (EQ) Tracking: Mandatory to align your mount with the celestial pole to completely eliminate field rotation during long-exposure imaging.
- Computerized GoTo Functionality: For fully automated targeting and object tracking location across the night sky.
- Active Autoguiding Interfaces: A dedicated autoguiding port or software interface capable of executing rapid pulse corrections to flatten the harmonic gear variations.
- Robust Wireless and Wired Connectivity: Built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or direct USB connections to control your mount using smart astrohubs (e.g. ASIAIR Plus, Stella Vita), smart devices (phone/tablet), mini-PC or laptop.
- Cross-Platform Protocol Support: Universal ASCOM, INDI, or Alpaca driver integration. This allows the mount to seamlessly communicate with advanced astrophotography software on a laptop or mini-PC (such as N.I.N.A., SGP, or SharpCap) as well as dedicated smart astro hubs (like the ZWO ASIAIR or PrimaLuceLab Eagle/StellaVita setups).
Whether you choose a lightweight travel mount or a heavy observatory giant, every system featured in this overview has the tracking accuracy required for long-exposure deep-sky astrophotography.
Our Roadmap: Ultra-lightweight vs. Intermediate vs Heavy Strain Wave Mounts
When shopping for a dual strain wave tracking platform, we shouldn’t compare apples to pears. We’ll discuss three tiers of strain wave gears based on the mount’s payload capacity to carry your telescope and imaging rig. We divide this into three functional categories:
- 1. Ultra-Lightweight Travel Class (8–15 kg / 17.6–33 lbs Max Capacity)
- The Persona: The nomadic astrophotographer or airline traveler who prioritizes a minuscule packing footprint above all else.
- The Gear: These teacup-sized mounts feature featherweight mount heads weighing just 2 to 4 kg (4.4 to 8.8 lbs). They are engineered to carry compact wide-field refractors (60mm to 80mm) or small camera lenses entirely counterweight-free. While they can handle up to 13 to 15 kg (28.6 to 33 lbs) by running an optional counterweight kit, they are natively optimized for fast, ultra-portable grab-and-go field sessions.
- 2. Intermediate Mobility Class (13.5–25 kg / 29.7–55 lbs Max Capacity)
- The Persona: The backyard astrophotographer or weekend field-tripper looking for the perfect “sweet spot” balance between rock-solid stability and easy transport.
- The Gear: Weighing in at a manageable 4 to 6 kg (8.8 to 13.2 lbs), these mid-sized workhorses can confidently swing intermediate imaging loads—like medium triplet refractors (90mm to 115mm) or compact 8-inch Schmidt-Cassegrain (SCT) tubes—completely free of balance shafts out of the box. Dropping an optional weight bar onto their rigid chassis safely expands their ceiling up to 25 kg (55 lbs), giving you substantial room to upgrade your glass down the line.
- 3. Heavy-Titan Observatory Class (20–30 kg / 44–66 lbs Max Capacity)
- The Persona: The deep-sky specialist with massive, long-focal-length optical setups who demands unyielding torque and maximum wind resistance.
- The Gear: These industrial-grade powerhouses employ massive, high-torque strain wave gearsets housed in beefier 5.7 kg to 6.75 kg (12.6 lbs to 14.9 lbs) mount heads. They are custom-tailored to command giant optical tubes—such as fully loaded 11-inch SCT imaging hubs, heavy 5-inch to 6-inch triplet apochromatic refractors, or wide-aperture Newtonians—with a staggering 20 kg (44 lbs) native capacity standalone, scaling up to 30 kg (66 lbs) with weights.
8–15 kg Capacity ⚖️ Intermediate Mobility
13.5–25 kg Capacity 🔭 Heavy-Titan Observatory
20–30+ kg Capacity
Furthermore, this guide is strictly limited to mainstream strain wave mounts that are actively supported, warrantied, and sold by major astronomical retailers across the US and the EU (such as High Point Scientific, Agena Astro, and Astroshop). If you are a risk-taker looking for budget-friendly, unbranded imports or generic strain wave clones that lack local dealer support and long-term warranties, please check out my dedicated blog post covering sub-$1,000 clone mounts, so you know what to excect when going down this route…
⚠️ Beware of the Strain Wave Tax: Strain wave mounts are almost universally sold as mount heads only. Between a rock-solid carbon fiber tripod (~$350) and an optional counterweight kit ($100–$150) required for maximizing heavy payloads, beginners need to budget an extra $400 to $500 above the base sticker price to safely complete their ecosystem and run a top-heavy imaging rig securely under the stars.
Part 1: The Best Travel/Beginner Strain Wave Mounts (8–15 kg / 17–33 lbs Max Capacity)
For nomadic astrophotographers, airline travelers, or anyone trying to fit an entire deep-sky imaging rig into a standard carry-on bag, this ultra-lightweight tier is where the magic of strain wave technology truly shines. Do not confuse these with simple camera star trackers; these are fully computerized, high-torque dual-axis GoTo mounts. Tipping the scales at an astonishingly light 2 to 4 kg (4.4 to 8.8 lbs), these compact mount heads possess enough structural muscle to swing fast telephoto tracking lenses alongside premium 70mm, 80mm, and even light 90mm triplet apochromatic (APO) refractors entirely counterweight-free. If you want to run high-quality imaging telescopes or premium telephoto lenses on remote field trips without hauling a heavy steel setup, these grab-and-go marvels offer the perfect mix of absolute portability and pinpoint tracking precision.
💡 Traditional GEM vs. Strain Wave: Are you unsure if an ultra-portable strain wave setup is right for you? Traditional German Equatorial Mounts (GEM) are significantly heavier to transport, require balancing, but they may cost less upfront and offer smooth, trainable mechanical tracking. If you want to explore stable, entry-level traditional GEMs like the SkyWatcher HEQ5-R Pro or similar, check out my comprehensive guide to the best beginner telescope mounts for astrophotography. This guide is exclusively about dual strain wave mounts
#1: ZWO AM3N Harmonic Drive Mount
Building directly on the massive success of its predecessor, the ZWO AM3N Harmonic Drive Mount introduces highly anticipated, quality-of-life upgrades tailored for modern field astrophotography. Utilizing a custom strain wave gear reducer and a synchronous belt drive, this ultra-lightweight titan head weighs a mere 4.1 kg (9 lbs) and easily packs into a carry-on bag for air travel. Despite its featherweight footprint, it delivers massive torque and completely eliminates the need for balancing under standard loads. It can effortlessly carry double its own weight—up to 8 kg (17.6 lbs)—without any counterweights at all. When paired with an optional counterweight kit, its capacity jumps to an impressive 13 kg (28.7 lbs), giving it plenty of muscle to track medium-sized deep-sky imaging rigs.
What truly sets the “N” version apart is its dramatically overhauled layout. ZWO relocated the primary electronic interface to a fully powered Declination Hub right on the dual Vixen/Losmandy dovetail saddle, integrating native USB-C and 12V DC power outputs. This allows for beautifully clean, 360-degree tangle-free wire management that eliminates the risk of disastrous cable snags during meridian flips. Furthermore, the mount now features native Bluetooth alongside built-in Wi-Fi, completely removing the necessity of a physical hand controller. Real-world users report stellar performance, with autoguiding via PHD2 or the ASIAIR app regularly pulling tight total RMS tracking errors between 0.35 and 0.7 arcseconds. Seamlessly syncing into the automated ASIAIR ecosystem, the AM3N stands out as an absolute top-tier benchmark for portable, grab-and-go astrophotography.
#2 iOptron HAE18C Strain Wave Mount
The iOptron HAE18C is an ultra-compact dual strain wave mount built for extreme portability, effortlessly packing full-blown robotic gear tech into a teacup-sized frame. Weighing just 2.8 kg (6.2 lbs), this travel-friendly titan operates in both equatorial mode for deep-sky astrophotography and altitude-azimuth (Alt-Az) mode for quick visual observations. Despite its featherweight CNC-machined body, it handles an 8.5 kg (18.7 lbs) payload entirely counterweight-free and without needing a complex balancing routine. If you attach an optional counterweight kit, that capacity scales up to 12 kg (26.5 lbs), giving it plenty of headroom to comfortably swing compact APO refractors. Control is completely modernized: thanks to built-in Wi-Fi and a direct USB-C port right on the mount chassis, you can completely ditch the optional hand controller and connect directly to third-party smart astrostations like an ASIAIR, or your preferred software running on a laptop, or a mini-PC.
On the tracking side, real-world community logs show impressive sub-arcsecond autoguiding performance, typically hovering between 0.5 and 0.8 arcseconds total RMS. To keep your stars perfectly round and tame the steep periodic error cycles native to strain wave gears, you simply need to configure your software aggressively with short 0.5- to 1.5-second guide exposures. While widely celebrated by backpackers and mobile imagers, the HAE18C does come with a couple of early-generation design quirks. First, the toolless altitude and azimuth locking wing bolts are made of smooth anodized aluminum, which can be slippery and difficult to cinch down in freezing weather. Second, the ASIAIR app can occasionally be picky with connection stability over the saddle’s pass-through ports, making it highly recommended to hardwire your USB cable directly into the USB-C port on the stationary mount base instead.
#3 Sky Watcher 100i Strain Wave
Entering the highly competitive strain wave market, Sky-Watcher introduces a formidable contender with the Wave 100i Strain Wave GoTo Mount. Weighing an ultra-lightweight 4.3 kg (9.5 lbs), this compact mount head uses custom strain wave gearing to completely bypass the need for traditional, heavy counterweights. In its standard configuration, the Wave 100i can support a hefty 10 kg (22 lbs) photographic payload. For astrophotographers with larger rigs, adding an optional counterweight bar and weight increases its total payload capacity to an impressive 15 kg (33 lbs). This mechanical muscle makes it highly versatile, easily managing everything from ultra-portable wide-field refractors to compact Schmidt-Cassegrain telescopes. Real-world user feedback highlights its exceptional autoguiding performance, with observers frequently reporting stable tracking accuracy that keeps total RMS guiding well under the sub-arcsecond mark when paired with modern mini-PCs or guiding software.
Beyond pure tracking capacity, the Wave 100i introduces several brilliant, community-minded design choices that make field operations much smoother. Sky-Watcher equipped the mount with an internal cabling architecture to eliminate potential cord snags during deep-sky imaging sessions, alongside built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth for reliable wireless control via the SynScan Pro app. It also boasts a highly praised electronic braking system on the R.A. axis to prevent equipment from dangerously slipping or dropping in the event of a sudden power loss. While early community adopters note that the manual altitude and azimuth adjustment screws require a firm touch when aligning under heavier loads, the inclusion of a dual-fit Vixen/Losmandy saddle and a dedicated red dot finder bracket for fast manual polar positioning makes the system incredibly user-friendly. For mobile astrophotographers searching for an ultra-portable, high-capacity tracking platform backed by a massive international support network, the Sky-Watcher Wave 100i stands out as a top-tier choice.
Specs Breakdown: Key Differences to Spot
When analysing the side-by-side metrics, three key trade-offs stand out. First is the weight versus payload calculation: the iOptron HAE18C wins on pure travel featherweight at just 2.6 kg (5.7 lbs), whereas the blockier Sky-Watcher Wave 100i leverages its heavier 4.3 kg (9.5 lbs) frame to carry a superior native payload of 10 kg (22 lbs) counterweight-free. The ZWO AM3N sits right in the middle at 4.1 kg (9 lbs), offering a highly capable standalone limit of 8 kg (17.6 lbs).
Second is the Saddle Power Hub division. Both the ZWO AM3N and iOptron HAE18C feature integrated USB-C and 12V outputs directly on the saddle clamp, routing lines cleanly with your telescope optics to completely eliminate cable drag. The Sky-Watcher Wave 100i lacks this accessory layer, forcing you to run external wiring.
For astrophotographers running software suites like N.I.N.A., SharpCap, or SGP on a laptop or mini-PC, all three mounts connect reliably using native ASCOM or INDI drivers over a standard, hardwired USB cable.
All three mounts are fully supported by the ZWO ASIAIR Plus via standard USB connections—you simply plug them in and select the corresponding driver in the app. However, the ZWO AM3N holds a clear quality-of-life edge due to first-party “Native Integration.” Because ZWO controls both the mount firmware and the smart hub ecosystem, you benefit from seamless firmware syncing and zero driver troubleshooting.
The built-in Bluetooth on the AM3N sounds like an amazing wireless feature for your ASIAIR Plus. Howver, community field-testing shows it is best saved for casual smartphone slewing or fast polar alignments. For serious, long-exposure deep-sky imaging, **stick to a physical USB cable**. Sending rapid, sub-second autoguiding correction pulses over Bluetooth introduces packet latency lags that will quickly turn tight tracking graphs into a choppy, star-bloating mess. For automated tracking stability, a hardwired data connection remains king.
| Feature / Metric | iOptron HAE18C | SW Wave 100i | ZWO AM3N |
| Drive Architecture | Dual Strain Wave | Dual Strain Wave | Dual Strain Wave |
| Mount Head Weight | 2.6 kg (5.7 lbs) | 4.3 kg (9.5 lbs) | 4.1 kg (9 lbs) |
| Native Payload (No Weights) | 8.5 kg (18.7 lbs) | 10 kg (22 lbs) | 8 kg (17.6 lbs) |
| Max Extended Payload | 12 kg (26.5 lbs) | 15 kg (33 lbs) | 13 kg (28.7 lbs) |
| Saddle Power Hub | Yes (USB-C/12V) | No | Yes (USB-C/12V) |
| N.I.N.A. Connection | Direct USB-C (ASCOM) | Direct USB (ASCOM) | Direct USB (ASCOM) |
| ASIAIR Plus Hookup | Direct USB-C Port | Direct USB Port | Native Integration |
My Top Picks
ZWO AM3N
Why choose this: You want absolute, hassle-free integration with the ASIAIR / ZWO ecosystem. Its standout layout features a fully powered Declination Hub directly on the saddle clamp plate, which keeps your device lines running dynamically with your optics and cuts cable tangles completely out of your workflow.
Sky-Watcher Wave 100i
Why choose this: You prioritize raw physical muscle over a powered saddle and want to track heavier setups counterweight-free. It offers an upgraded 10 kg baseline load limit, an integrated R.A. safety brake, full internal cable routes, and a rugged dual-fit clamp configuration backing larger imaging rigs.
iOptron HAE18C
Why choose this: You prioritize minimizing back-breaking equipment weight over everything else. This teacup-sized travel frame scales in with an incredibly featherweight 2.6 kg profile while natively handling up to 8.1 kg completely counterweight-free, boasting an updated chassis with built-in wireless base communication.
Part 2: Intermediate Mobility Strain Wave Mounts (13.5–25 kg / 29.7–55 lbs Max Capacity)
At some point, every dedicated astrophotographer experiences “aperture fever” and yearns for a tracking platform that can support larger, heavier optics than a beginner travel mount allows. If you are looking to run a mid-sized refractor, a large Schmidt-Cassegrain (SCT), or a hefty Newtonian telescope, you have officially crossed over into intermediate and advanced deep-sky astrophotography.
For this section of our guide, we are stepping away from the ultralight travel class to focus exclusively on heavy-duty, future-proof platforms capable of anchoring a massive 15 to 30 kg (33 to 66 lbs) maximum payload capacity. These industrial-grade mount heads typically command price tags in the $2,000 to $3,500 range, representing a serious investment in your tracking accuracy and structural stability. Let’s break down how these top-tier powerhouses compare when swinging heavy glass under the stars.
Part 2: Intermediate Strain Wave Mounts (13.5 to 15 kg w/o up to 25 kg with a counterweight)
If you have outgrown your entry-level travel setup and need a platform that can handle serious imaging gear without turning your backyard setup into a back-breaking chore, this intermediate bracket represents the ultimate sweet spot. These highly modern mounts pack industrial-grade strain wave gear sets into compact, lightweight mount heads weighing just 4 to 6 kg (8.8 to 13.2 lbs). Yet, they possess enough structural torque to swing medium triplet refractors or 8-inch Schmidt-Cassegrain (SCT) tubes entirely counterweight-free right out of the box.
🔭 Looking for an Advanced GEM Alternative? While intermediate dual strain wave systems are unbeatable for mobile field trips, traditional heavy-duty German Equatorial Mounts (GEM) remain a lovely alternative for high-wind environments and permanent backyard observatories. If you want to compare these strain wave options against legendary, time-tested worm-gear workhorses like the classic Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro or high-end iOptron mounts, jump over to my guide reviewing the best advanced telescope mounts for astrophotography.
iOptron HAE29C AZ/EQ
The iOptron HAE29C is widely praised across the astrophotography community as an exceptional, highly modern grab-and-go mount. By utilizing precision strain wave gear technology on both axes, it drastically maximizes efficiency, boasting a tiny 3.7 kg (8.15 lbs) mount head that can support a massive 13.5 kg (29.7 lbs) payload without a counterweight, and up to 18 kg (40 lbs) with an optional counterweight setup for heavier gear. Powering this impressive mechanical leverage are two high-torque stepper motors utilizing a hybrid reduction drive system—incorporating a quiet, vibration-dampening toothed synchronous timing belt as a pre-reduction step before feeding into the primary strain wave cogs to achieve an final reduction ratio of 480:1 on the RA axis and 360:1 on the DEC axis. Users love its dual AZ/EQ versatility, allowing it to seamlessly switch between Alt-Azimuth visual tracking and precise Equatorial astrophotography. The latest “C” model also adds a streamlined USB-C interface and a smart cable-management saddle that routes 12V power and USB ports directly to your telescope, effectively eliminating cable snags. Complete with internal Wi-Fi and electronic friction brakes that protect your optical tube during unexpected power drops, it represents a massive leap forward in ultra-portable, observatory-grade precision.
While user experiences on community forums are overwhelmingly positive, some owners note minor quirks, such as the push-pull azimuth alignment bolts feeling a bit imprecise during polar alignment, and somewhat finicky latitude range limiter bolts. Additionally, because the hybrid drive mechanics rely on a tensioned rubber timing belt tightly packed inside the housing, it does mean that long-term owners might eventually face standard belt wear over several years of heavy use. However, when it comes to actual imaging performance, real-world forum reports consistently praise its guided tracking capabilities. Once configured with standard fast-exposure settings in autoguiding software like PHD2, astrophotographers regularly achieve excellent real-world guided RMS tracking figures between 0.4 and 0.8 arcseconds. These minor ergonomic and mechanical nuances are easily managed with a little field practice, and the clear consensus is that the mount’s superb guided accuracy, rock-solid stability at full capacity, and incredible portability make it a game-changing asset.
ZWO AM5N
The ZWO AM5N is highly celebrated across the astrophotography community as an incredibly capable, hyper-portable powerhouse that builds perfectly on the success of its predecessor. Utilizing precision strain wave gear technology on both axes, this ultra-lightweight 5.5 kg (12.1 lbs) mount head can effortlessly support an impressive 15 kg (33 lbs) payload without a counterweight, and up to 20 kg (44 lbs) with an optional counterweight setup for heftier optical tubes. This mechanical leverage is driven by a high-torque hybrid system that utilizes a synchronous timing belt drive pre-reduction coupled with a specialized strain wave gear, yielding an excellent overall reduction ratio of 300:1 on both axes. True to its modern “N” designation, the mount introduces a brilliant internal cable-management solution that routes an integrated 12V DC power output and a USB-C port directly to the declination saddle, allowing for a full 360-degree rotation without any nightmarish cord tangles or snagging. Paired with an internal mechanical gear brake for reliable power-failure protection, it offers stellar grab-and-go convenience without sacrificing premium observatory performance.
While real-world user reviews are exceptionally positive, owners have highlighted a couple of minor hardware quirks. First, multiple users have pointed out that the mount’s Wi-Fi module is still technically housed inside the plug-in hand controller rather than the main mount chassis, meaning the controller must remain plugged in and dangling if you want a wireless connection to your phone or tablet. Second, because the system is so incredibly light, several owners note that the matching TC40 carbon fiber travel tripod can feel a bit top-heavy and sensitive to wind under heavier telescope loads, often requiring you to heavily weigh down the included tripod stone bag to ensure complete peace of mind. However, when it comes to actual imaging performance, real-world forum logs show a massive step up from the original model due to its drastically reduced ±10 arcsecond periodic error. When dialed in with standard fast-exposure autoguiding via software like PHD2, astrophotographers regularly achieve remarkable real-world guided RMS tracking figures tightly floating between 0.3 and 0.8 arcseconds. Ultimately, these minor quirks are easily managed, and the overwhelming consensus remains that the AM5N’s superb guided accuracy, vastly improved cable layout, and incredible payload-to-weight ratio make it a top-tier choice for mobile astrophotographers.
Pegasus Astro NYX-88
The Pegasus Astro NYX-88 is highly celebrated across the astrophotography community as a premium, ultra-portable powerhouse tailored specifically for mobile deep-sky imagers. Utilizing precision strain wave gears on both axes, this beautifully CNC-machined 5 kg (11 lbs) mount head can comfortably support an impressive 14 kg (31 lbs) payload without a counterweight, which can be pushed even higher by utilizing the built-in M12 threaded shaft hole to add an optional counterweight setup for heavier telescopes. This immense lifting leverage is driven by high-torque stepper motors paired with a synchronous belt drive pre-reduction, offering an extremely fine tracking resolution down to 0.15 arcseconds. Astronomers love its versatile dual Alt-Azimuth and Equatorial functionality, allowing for seamless switching between casual visual observation and demanding photography. Furthermore, the NYX-88 sets itself apart by natively incorporating an integrated web server that communicates seamlessly with driverless ASCOM Alpaca clients alongside built-in Wi-Fi and a secure GX12 power connector. Complete with an electronic brake on the RA axis to securely lock your optical tube during an unexpected power loss, it delivers rock-solid, travel-ready observatory tracking.
While user experiences are positive, real-world field use reveals a couple of quirks. First, because the mount features a remarkably lightweight frame, multiple users point out that pushing its capacity close to that 14 kg limit—especially with high-torque, long-focal-length setups like a 130mm refractor or a deep-body Schmidt-Cassegrain—can cause the motors to work under massive strain and occasionally slip or produce a high-pitched protest if the telescope’s center of gravity is too high. Imagers emphasize that because strain wave mounts are heavily impacted by a telescope’s physical torque and moment of inertia, running a small counterweight or sticking to lower-profile imaging trains is highly recommended for heavier gear. Second, some early owners have noted a slight software learning curve regarding the mount’s internal time-setting behavior, which occasionally requires careful synchronization through the Pegasus Unity Platform or mobile application to prevent time mismatch errors when establishing an initial connection to N.I.N.A. or ASCOM. However, when it comes to actual performance under the stars, the mount is highly praised; once configured with standard fast-exposure autoguiding intervals (0.5 to 1.5 seconds) in PHD2 to smooth out the inherent harmonic periodic curve, astrophotographers regularly document superb guided RMS tracking figures fluctuating tightly between 0.4 and 0.7 arcseconds. Ultimately, these minor operational considerations are easily mastered, and the overwhelming consensus is that the NYX-88’s incredible payload-to-weight ratio, native Alpaca architecture, and flawless tracking make it a top-tier choice for nomadic astrophotographers.
Sky Watcher Wave 150i
The Sky-Watcher Wave 150i is a prominent contender in the intermediate strain wave market, offering a highly versatile dual-axis harmonic drive platform that weighs just 5.8 kg (12.8 lbs) yet boasts an impressive native payload capacity of 15 kg (33 lbs) without any counterweights. If you attach an optional counterweight kit, that capacity ramps up to a hefty 25 kg (55 lbs), making it an appealing, lightweight replacement for back-straining mounts like the classic EQ6-R Pro. A major standout engineering feature is its advanced internal through-mount cabling; Sky-Watcher equipped the mount with a stationary internal connection route that passes all the way up to a dedicated Declination saddle hub, preventing a single trailing cable from snagging during a meridian flip. Additionally, it natively supports both Alt-Azimuth and Equatorial tracking configurations, integrates with third-party control systems or the wireless SynScan app, and features a built-in red LED map light to preserve night vision. For users who prefer a tactile experience, it features a physical handset port that maintains native compatibility with Sky-Watcher’s classic SynScan hand controller, though it is sold separately.
Real-world user feedback highlights a few mechanical nuances that buyers should anticipate. Because it is an ultra-lightweight strain wave mount handling large telescope payloads, the system creates a top-heavy center of gravity that relies heavily on a rock-solid tripod class; users occasionally note that the factory rubber feet can feel slightly “squishy” in sudden wind gusts, making a stiff carbon fiber or steel pillar extension a highly popular upgrade. Mechanically, several early adopters reported encountering a stiff altitude adjustment knob right out of the box, though this smoothly loosens up after a brief initial break-in period. Fortunately, when it comes to tracking performance, the mount is an exceptional performer. Imagers note that while it exhibits the typical harmonic periodic error curve common to all strain wave gears, real-world field results prove that modern autoguiding software can tames these spikes; by utilizing short, fast 0.5 to 1-second exposure cadences in software like PHD2 or an ASIAIR, the mount easily locks on to deliver an outstanding 0.35″ to 0.70″ total RMS tracking accuracy over long-exposure deep-sky sequences.
Specs Breakdown: Key Differences
Software Control Philosophy: Software communication styles vary across these platforms. While the ZWO, iOptron, and Sky-Watcher platforms interface effortlessly via standard USB pipelines to smart hubs or laptops, the Pegasus Astro NYX-88 features a driverless ASCOM Alpaca architecture. With an integrated web server built directly into the mount head, it connects natively over Wi-Fi to Alpaca clients without requiring Windows PC drivers.
Lifting Efficiency: If pure weight-to-payload efficiency is your priority, the iOptron HAE29C is a marvel, weighing just 3.7 kg (8.15 lbs) but handling nearly four times its own mass standalone. However, if you want maximum ceiling limits for larger setups down the road, the Sky-Watcher Wave 150i leverages its blockier frame to support a massive 25 kg (55 lbs) maximum load when utilizing a counterweight shaft kit.
Cable Management & Saddle Layouts: Cable management splits these systems down the middle. The ZWO AM5N and iOptron HAE29C feature processing power hubs directly on the declination saddle clamp, routing short power lines with your optics. The Sky-Watcher Wave 150i handles this using an stationary internal through-mount channel, while the Pegasus NYX-88 opts for a completely clean, minimalist saddle that leaves cable routing entirely up to your external management kits.
| Feature / Metric | iOptron HAE29C | Pegasus NYX-88 | SW Wave 150i | ZWO AM5N |
| Mount Head Weight | 3.7 kg (8.15 lbs) | 5.0 kg (11 lbs) | 5.8 kg (12.8 lbs) | 5.5 kg (12.1 lbs) |
| Native Payload (No Weights) | 13.5 kg (29.7 lbs) | 14.0 kg (31 lbs) | 15.0 kg (33 lbs) | 15.0 kg (33 lbs) |
| Max Extended Payload | 18.0 kg (40 lbs) | 20.0 kg (44 lbs) | 25.0 kg (55 lbs) | 20.0 kg (44 lbs) |
| Saddle Hub Cable Routes | Yes (USB/12V Hub) | No (GX12 Input Only) | Yes (Internal Through-Channel) | Yes (USB-C/12V Hub) |
| Unique Ecosystem Hook | Dual AZ/EQ Mode | Native ASCOM Alpaca | SynScan Handset Port | ASIAIR Native Syn |
ZWO AM5N
Choose this mount if: You are already fully invested in the ZWO wireless ecosystem and use an ASIAIR Plus. It offers seamless first-party driver sync, automated app firmware updates, and a brilliant powered declination saddle clamp hub that completely eliminates device line tangles during overnight automated meridian flips.
Sky-Watcher Wave 150i
Choose this mount if: You run open-source software (like N.I.N.A. or SharpCap) on a mini-PC or laptop and want maximum payload head-room for future upgrades. Dropping an optional weight kit onto its blocky frame boosts its load ceiling to a massive 25 kg (55 lbs)—safely anchoring heavy Newtonians or large 11-inch SCT assemblies.
iOptron HAE29C
Choose this mount if: You want an incredibly capable grab-and-go system that maximizes physical travel efficiency. Weighing just 3.7 kg (8.15 lbs), it is the lightest mount in this intermediate tier while confidently swinging a 13.5 kg (29.7 lbs) imaging configuration counterweight-free, featuring an upgraded USB-C saddle connection hub.
Part 3: Heavy-Titan Observatory Class Strain Wave Mounts (20–30 kg / 44–66 lbs Max Capacity)
When you cross the threshold into massive optical tubes—like a fully loaded 11-inch Schmidt-Cassegrain (SCT), a heavy 5-inch triplet refractor, or a wide-aperture imaging Newtonian—you leave the realm of portable travel trackers behind and enter the domain of true observatory-grade giants. The mounts in this elite class are built around industrial-grade strain wave gear sets engineered to deliver staggering structural torque. Tipping the scales with slightly beefier 5.7 kg to 6.75 kg (12.6 lbs to 14.9 lbs) mount heads, these high-end powerhouses can confidently command a massive 20 kg (44 lbs) imaging footprint completely counterweight-free. For deep-sky astrophotographers tracking with long focal lengths who demand unyielding wind resistance and rock-solid tracking stability, these heavy-lifting titans represent the absolute peak of strain wave performance.
🔭 Considering a GEM or Hybrid System? While heavy-duty strain wave titans offer unmatched weight-to-payload lifting ratios for massive optical trains, traditional high-capacity German Equatorial and hybrid friction-drive mounts remain the undisputed kings for permanent backyard observatories. If you do not require a lightweight travel head and want to compare these strain wave options against ultra-precise, heavy-duty worm-gear workhorses like the classic EQ6-R Pro or high-end Losmandy frames, dive into my deep-dive guide on the best advanced telescope mounts for astrophotography.
🛑 Beware of the Advanced Strain Wave Tax: While intermediate mount heads in this 15 to 30 kg (33 to 66 lbs) class have incredible lifting capacity, the hidden costs scale up rapidly with your telescope’s size. Do not forget that these are sold as mount heads only. At this weight tier, an optional counterweight kit (~$150) becomes highly recommended—not because the gears can’t handle the weight, but to keep your expensive, top-heavy optical rig from physically tipping over in a sudden gust of wind. Additionally, if you don’t already own a heavy-duty, industrial-grade pier or tripod, a matching high-capacity tripod will add another $400 to $600 to your final invoice. Plan your budget accordingly!
ZWO AM7
The ZWO AM7 is highly celebrated across the astrophotography community as a heavy-hitting, exceptionally robust mobile powerhouse that scales up the brand’s popular strain wave architecture for demanding setups. Utilizing high-torque internal strain wave gears paired with a 300:1 pre-drive synchronous timing belt reduction on both axes, this 6.75 kg (14.9 lbs) mount head can effortlessly command a massive 20 kg (44 lbs) payload without a counterweight. If you intend to fly larger, long-focal-length optical tubes like a heavy 10-inch or 11-inch Schmidt-Cassegrain rig, adding an optional counterweight setup securely bumps its maximum payload capacity up to 30 kg (66 lbs). True to its versatile dual-mode designation, it easily transitions between intuitive Alt-Azimuth visual tracking and precise Equatorial tracking. It also comes standard with ZWO’s individual periodic error (PE) testing—guaranteeing its baseline error remains within a tight $\pm10$ arcseconds. Furthermore, it incorporates a highly appreciated smart cable-management saddle with integrated USB-C and 12V DC power outputs right at the dovetail plate. This drastically reduces dangling cords, eliminating any risk of catastrophic cable snags during wide tracking slews or automatic meridian flips.
While first-hand user experiences on forums like Cloudy Nights and Stargazers Lounge are highly enthusiastic, early adopters have highlighted a couple of real-world quirks when handling such massive payloads on a compact frame. First, several owners emphasize that because strain wave mounts undergo significant and sudden load shifts when slewing heavy, unbalanced setups, it is absolutely imperative to clamp the altitude locking levers completely down—with some users even utilizing Allen keys on the lever sockets to prevent the altitude play from subtly throwing off a precise polar alignment. Second, experienced imagers note that because the mount head is so small relative to its immense lifting power, placing it on standard lightweight carbon fiber travel tripods can feel unnervingly top-heavy, making a heavily weighted stone bag or a much wider, stiffer tripod choice critical for total stability in high winds. However, when it comes to long-exposure autoguiding performance, the AM7 completely delivers. Once paired with rapid 0.5 to 1.5-second exposure intervals in guiding software like PHD2 or an ASIAIR to smooth out its steep harmonic periodic curve, astrophotographers routinely document outstanding real-world guided RMS tracking figures holding steadily between 0.4 and 0.7 arcseconds. Ultimately, these minor stability considerations are easily accounted for in the field, and the clear consensus is that the AM7’s incredible payload-to-weight ratio, pristine tracking accuracy, and clean cable layout make it a premium, game-changing choice for serious mobile imagers
iOptron HAE43C AZ/EQ

The iOptron HAE43C is widely celebrated across the astrophotography community as a high-capacity, exceptionally portable mid-sized titan. Utilizing precision strain wave gear technology on both axes, it drastically maximizes efficiency, boasting a lightweight 5.7 kg (12.6 lbs) mount head that can effortlessly manage an incredible 20 kg (44 lbs) payload without a counterweight, and up to 25 kg (55 lbs) with an optional counterweight setup for heavier gear. Powering this impressive mechanical leverage are two high-torque stepper motors utilizing a hybrid reduction drive system—incorporating a quiet, vibration-dampening toothed synchronous timing belt as a pre-reduction step before feeding into the primary strain wave cogs to achieve an immense final reduction ratio of 640:1 on the RA axis and 480:1 on the DEC axis. Users love its dual AZ/EQ versatility, allowing it to seamlessly switch between intuitive Alt-Azimuth visual tracking and precise Equatorial astrophotography. True to the latest “C” model design, it boasts a built-in Wi-Fi motherboard, a direct USB-C interface, and a smart cable-management saddle that routes 12V power and USB ports directly to your telescope to effectively eliminate cable snags. Complete with electronic friction brakes that protect your optical tube during unexpected power drops, it represents a massive leap forward in ultra-portable, observatory-grade precision.
While user experiences on community forums like Cloudy Nights and Stargazers Lounge are highly enthusiastic, real-world field use reveals a couple of minor hardware quirks. First, because the HAE43 utilizes a broader 120mm base diameter with side-mount locking screws rather than a traditional central T-bolt, it is natively incompatible with common lightweight travel tripods or standard smaller mini-piers, typically requiring owners to use iOptron’s heavier-class tripods (like the LiteRoc series). Second, because the hybrid mechanics rely on a tensioned rubber timing belt tightly packed inside the housing to drive the gear system, long-term owners should keep in mind that the belt will eventually experience standard wear over several years of heavy field duty. However, when it comes to actual imaging performance, real-world forum reports consistently praise its guided tracking capabilities. Once configured with standard fast-exposure settings (often between 0.5 and 1.5 seconds) in autoguiding software like PHD2 to smooth out the inherent periodic error of strain wave gears, astrophotographers regularly achieve excellent real-world guided RMS tracking figures fluctuating tightly between 0.4 and 0.8 arcseconds. Ultimately, these minor nuances are quickly managed with a little field practice, and the clear consensus is that the HAE43C’s superb guided accuracy, massive weight capacity, and incredible portability make it a premium, game-changing choice.
*Note: Astroshop only appears to have the more expensive HAE43C-EC version
Pegasus Astro NYX-101
The Nyx-101 mount is a high-performing, high-payload mount designed and produced based on the inspiration from the ancient Greek goddess of the night, Nyx. With a maximum payload capacity of 20 kg (44 lbs), this mount can easily support imaging equipment without the need for counterweights or shafts. The mount uses a strain wave drive on both the RA and DEC movement, resulting in a backlash-free operation with high torque at high payloads. The mount features a fully CNC-machined aluminum alloy 6061 body, which is black and blue anodized, ensuring long-lasting performance. Additionally, the mount comes with branded parts, including stepper motors and strain wave gears, to ensure the mount performs flawlessly for years. Safety features include an electronic brake on the RA axis to prevent backsliding when the power is off, as well as safety limit stops during slew or tracking. The Nyx-101 mount is a lightweight design, weighing only 6.4 kg (14 lb), and can easily handle a wide range of telescopes, from small refractors to fully loaded SCT 11-inch telescopes. The mount can be used in either Equatorial or Alt-Az mode, making it more suitable for astrophotography and visual observations.
The mount can be switched from Equatorial to Altazimuth mode using a PC or mobile application. The Nyx-101 mount supports wireless and USB 2 connectivity and is compatible with LX200 protocol and Sky Safari for mobile interaction. The mount can operate on a DC 12 Volts Battery and requires less than 0.6Amp during tracking and up to 2.5 Amps during slewing. The mount includes a low profile and rigid universal saddle that accepts Vixen and Losmandy dovetails. Additional features of the Nyx-101 mount include an integrated ST-4 Autoguiding Port, Polemaster Adapter for precise polar alignment, electronic assistant for initial polar alignment, reverse voltage polarity protection, ASCOM, INDI, Sky Safari support, and mobile control. The mount also features safety limit encoders on the RA Axis to prevent internal cable snag or collision with the tripod. Firmware upgrades are also easily achievable, allowing users to stay up-to-date with bug fixes and new features. Overall, the Nyx-101 mount is an excellent choice for astrophotographers and astronomers who require a high-performing and reliable mount that can easily handle high payloads.
To map out the major hardware differences before analyzing each head in depth, let’s see how these three premier titans match up side-by-side:
Specs Breakdown: Key Differences to Spot in this Class
- Lifting Efficiency vs. Ceiling Limits: While all three heavy-weights share an identical, impressive baseline of 20 kg (44 lbs) tracking capacity without any counterweights, they differ significantly in chassis weight and headroom. The iOptron HAE43C is the absolute marvel of structural efficiency here, tipping the scales at a lean 5.7 kg (12.6 lbs), making it the easiest to lift onto a pier. However, the ZWO AM7 trades a heavier 6.75 kg (14.9 lbs) body frame for massive ultimate muscle; adding a counterweight bar to its high-torque axis gears bumps its payload ceiling to an unrivaled 30 kg (66 lbs) maximum.
- Cable Routing and Saddle Ergonomics: Cable management solutions split these three heavy-weights down the middle. Both the ZWO AM7 and iOptron HAE43C feature dedicated digital power and data hubs built directly into the moving declination saddle clamp, allowing you to feed 12V power and USB-C lines straight into your cameras and focusers with zero wrap risk during tracking loops. Conversely, the Pegasus Astro NYX-101 focuses on raw, ultra-rigid connection security; it leaves the saddle interface entirely slick and low-profile to handle heavy dovetail bars, choosing instead to protect your equipment via smart software safety encoders built into its internal RA axis housing.
- Tripod Base and Structural Pier Stability: Because these systems track exceptionally long focal lengths under severe load shifts, the physical connection to your tripod base is critical. The ZWO and Pegasus designs utilize standard central thread-bolt configurations that allow them to step down to rigid travel tripods if needed (provided you use a heavy ballast bag). The iOptron HAE43C approaches this differently by implementing an ultra-wide 120mm base diameter with side-mount locking screws. This eliminates standard central T-bolts entirely, yielding massive surface-area stability but restricting your choices out of the box to heavy-duty, industrial-class piers or matching large tripods like the iOptron LiteRoc series.
| Feature / Metric | ZWO AM7 | iOptron HAE43C | Pegasus NYX-101 |
| Mount Head Weight | 6.75 kg (14.9 lbs) | 5.7 kg (12.6 lbs) | 6.4 kg (14.1 lbs) |
| Native Payload (No Weights) | 20.0 kg (44 lbs) | 20.0 kg (44 lbs) | 20.0 kg (44 lbs) |
| Max Extended Payload | 30.0 kg (66 lbs) | 25.0 kg (55 lbs) | 20.0 kg (44 lbs) |
| Saddle Power Hub | Yes (USB-C / 12V) | Yes (USB-C / 12V) | No (Rigid Low-Profile) |
| Tripod Connection Base | Standard T-Bolt Style | Broad 120mm Base | Standard Base Fitting |
ZWO AM7
Choose this mount if: You have massive flagship telescopes (like an 11-inch SCT or 130mm+ triplet apo) and want native, high-torque synchronization inside the ZWO ASIAIR ecosystem. It features an unparalleled 30 kg (66 lbs) ultimate load limit when running counterweights, individually factory-tested low periodic error, and an integrated powered saddle hub that clears cable clutter effortlessly.
Pegasus NYX-101
Choose this mount if: You operate open-source software (N.I.N.A., INDI, or ASCOM Alpaca) via a mini-PC and want an industrial-grade CNC-machined chassis. It foregoes complex saddle routing to prioritize raw, zero-backlash structural torque under load, securing your investment via smart internal safety encoders and a rock-solid heavy-duty tracking configuration.
iOptron HAE43C
Choose this mount if: You want a high-capacity observatory-ready platform but want to minimize back-straining lifting weight. It is the absolute lightest mount head in this heavy-duty tier at just 5.7 kg (12.6 lbs) while natively stabilizing 20 kg (44 lbs) counterweight-free, running a broad 120mm base plate that cuts vibration out entirely.
Very good review. I was leaning towards buying one. This article convinced me to wait fro another 6mnths to a year to see field results.
Nice post! Thank a lot for the comparison.
For no particular reason other than better be safe than sorry I have set the Ioptron CEM70 as the baseline. Do you think any of those harmonic mounts in your review can match or even outperform the CEM70 when it comes to guiding. Let’s take a C8 Edge HD with a reducer and OAG guiding using a ASI2600mm pro plus filter wheel
Hi Gert, I’m not sure yet. I will be testing out the AM5 with my Celestron Edge HD 8″ with a focal length of 2000mm. I’m really curious about the guiding results – if they are about 0.5 arcseconds I’ll be happy. Stay tuned.
Any results using the C8 EdgeHD? I’m curious as I’m thinking of using this combination of scope and mount.
I have the HAE43EC and the CEM70 basic version. Tracking with de CEM 70 is usually 0,25-0.50 depending on conditions. The HAE43EC is the same if not better. Both used on a fixed sturdy pier and with a 140mm f7 (15kg) setup. Using OAG ASI220 ASI2600mm and ASIAIR-plus. I do balans the scope as much as possible as this does help the accuracy of the guiding. Also I make the scope a bit tail heavy. This helps as well. I am still figuring out what guiding exposures are best. For the strainwave short exposures in the range of 1-2sec are working well. For the CEM I tend to go for 3-4 seconds and less aggressive. Actually I find the HAE very easy to use and I just sold my CEM70 as its been rarely used. The guy is collecting it tomorrow.
Using the strain wave on a tripod without a counter weight is not advisable (even with small scopes) as the force on the tripod head is big and it tends to bend over spoiling the polar alignment.
An iOptron tri-pier is very stable. But still I use the counterweight for anything over 8kg.
I had the HAE29 for about two weeks, and immediately had problems. The key problem is the HandControlls poor communication with 2 Android 11 Tablets and NO communication with a Smartphone. I posted a review on AgenaAstro and it was pulled about 36 hours later, I also posted a review on iOptrons own site. It was not untill I told iOptron that I was going to find a YouTube maker and post it that I was quickly notified that iOptron was going to refund me.
I own about 3 of those harmonic mounts (ZWO AM5, iOptron HEM 27EC and Sharpstar MK III) and they all perform very well. I have used them mainly with a 600mm and a 1300mm scopes, no OAG but a 200mm William Optics guidescope.
All of them deliver constantly well under 1″ total error guiding and the stars were nice and round.
Communication wise, never had any troubles either connecting to the mounts directly or connecting them to AsiAir.
The Sharpstar MK III is a true workhorse moving my 15kg scope around with ease.
All those mounts are lighweight and the absence of counterweights makes them perfect travel companions.
I got my HAE43 last week. After 2 short nights I‘m still not heavily impressed about the guiding results using my ASIAIR.
Guiding was around 1“ but on a low target. (Orion from 30degree down to 15degree)
Sometime a bit under 1“ sometimes a bit higher. Max guiding curves relatively constant swinging from +2“ to -2“ at 1second guiding exposure.
Have to test it more to the zenith for final results.
On problem is that the usb connection from the mount to the ASIAIR does not work. Can’t tell the reason.
Wi-Fi works but not super stable. Had some failed connections.
I have a question about the capacity of these types of mounts in general. For German Equatorial mounts like the Sky-Watcher EQ6r Pro we are warned about not exceeding above “50%, 60%, 40% etc.” of the capacity when used for astrophotography. Does that also apply to these mounts or can they truly hold our gear up to the rated capacity? For the AM5 will I be limited to about 50% of the 20 kg when I use it for astrophotography? Thanks.
Hi Don,
Good question. I’m testing the AM5 right now and the first couple of nights were great. I was able to get tracking below 1 arcsecond per pixel with my Edge HD 8″ with a filter wheel, camera, and guide scope. As the Harmonic Drive technique is very different, I do think these mounts cannot be compared to the same “rules of thumb” as german equatorial mounts. I have a new b/vlog where I talk about my first experiences with the mount – you can find it here: https://astroforumspace.com/zwo-am5-mount-review/
Clear skies!
You replied to this comment.
Hi Adam, thanks. Just as a follow up: I’v tested my ZWO AM5 now on 6 nights with gear varying from a lightweight APO refractor to my heavier 8″ Edge HD SCT Telescope with camera, guidcam, filterwheel etc. My ZWO doesn’t seem to mind the extra weight. Guiding is always below one arcsecond, mostly around .5 to .7 in RA and DEC. Cheers.
Got my AM5 end of April. Got 12 nights of guiding. Then on Monday June 19 AISAir app reported “USB serial disconnected” for the mount. Tried my older ASIAir Plus (non 256G version) same message. Plugged the AM5 in my Windows 11 PC and it reports device descriptor request failed and my MacBook Pro 2019 doesn’t see it at all. Opened a ticket with ZWO that day.
Today, Thursday, got a response I should still be able to use it with WiFi and was asked if the hand controller worked. I tried the HC and nothing. The LED next to the USB port is dark. The power button lights up. But nothing. I reported back but looks like I have a $2300 brick. No offer from them to fix or replace it at this point. Someone on the FB AM5/AM3 page reported their AM5 USB died about a month before mine. They obviously have some kind of teething problem and that is a shame. Maybe I’ll try a ZWO mount again in about 5 years or so.
Oddly enough I was going to buy a 2nd AM5 for my rig on the SkyGuider Pro. That is not happening now. Colleagues at work recommend the RST-135. Although it seems hard to find here in the USA I may go that route. Rainbow also has been doing this longer so hopefully they have better quality.
I’m sorry to hear that, Alex. You’re well within the warranty period I think? I’d ask for a replacement if I were you. Good luck. I hope this gets solved soon.
They said they will send a new mother board. I still do not have a tracking number.
In the meantime, I’ve sprung for the RST-135E more expensive version. I’m also waiting on that to arrive.
I have the NYX-101 since April and all I can say is that it is a great mount in terms of tracking
I have only used it with my 200/620 Sharpstar Newt (12kg fully loaded), w/o CW, but I have also loaded my big RC250 (~ 20kgs in total with computer, guidescope…), with a 5kg CW, and the mount operated flawlessly (I have not done any imaging with this set-up yet).
Another point worth mentioning, is the quality of their customer support; I’ve had several teething issues, mostly coming from problems generated by my lack of experience with the mount (which has been flawless since day one), and the communication by mail with them was extremely fast (they even helped me on a Friday at 9PM!).
I strongly recommend this mount which is superb in terms of build quality and tracking performance
Thanks for your personal review Massi!
Someone must be nuts to pay for those mounts $8500.
Yes, you can use the mount in alt-az mode for tracking
Thanks!
Well, recently i upgrade my old SW EQ5 mount with OnStep mount kit, and with my Quattro 150p on it, i achieve almost always guiding under 1″ – mostly around 0.45″ – 0.65″ per pixel.
Great thread and fantastic comments. I am in need of a new mount that has excellent cold weather operating temperatures below -25c, only one advertised to that temp. Anyone here have experience with WarpAstron? They use no reduction gears or belts but direct drive from servo motors, for cold weather they utilize heat from the system to keep it in operating temps.